State v. Rathbun
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1
Bridgewater, J.
— The State appeals the trial court’s order of dismissal nunc pro tunc, in which it found that evidence of methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia was improperly seized. Robert K. Rathbun had been working on a truck, but at the time of his arrest, he was 40 to 60 feet away from the truck and had jumped a fence. We hold that Rathbun was not in close enough physical proximity to the truck such that the vehicle could be searched incident to his arrest. We affirm.
¶2 The parties have stipulated to the trial court’s findings of fact. The findings of fact state that on February 12,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Black v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PattonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. CaseresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. RathbunCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.