Legal Opinion
International Marketing, Limited v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Inc., and Swift-Eckrich, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 23, 1999No. 98-3461PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
On August 7, 1997, International Marketing, Limited (“IML”) filed a complaint in Oregon state court seeking over $30 million in damages from Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (“ADM”) and Swift-Eckrich (“Swift”). Preferring a federal forum and taking advantage of the diversity of citizenship between the parties, ADM and Swift removed the case to federal court. There, on April 10, 1998, a magistrate judge sitting for the District Court for the District of Oregon dismissed the complaint in its entirety for failure to state a claim. In the same order, the court granted…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- HPI Health Care Services, Inc. v. Mt. Vernon Hospital, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Reger Development, LLC v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger DhimantecCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Colorado, Inc. , Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Morritz J. Weiss v. Brad CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.