Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Glas

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1907No. Civ. No. 281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior' Court of Madera County, and from an order denying a new trial M. L. Short, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover from

the defendants the sum of $475 alleged to be due under an agreement for the erection of a party-wall. The plaintiffs, it is alleged, became the owners of the claim against the defendants under an assignment of the same to them by Wehrman & Meilikie, a corporation, incorporated and organized under the laws of California. Wehrman & Meilikie, in their corporate capacity, and the defendants were the owners, respectively, of adjoining lots in Block No. 40 of the town of Madera, in the county of Madera. Having in view the erection of brick…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burlock v. PeckThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Milton v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Spanfelner v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Ferguson v. DamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API