Legal Opinion

United Porto Rican Sugar Co. v. Saldana

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 19, 1934No. 2873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.

May 19, 1931, the plaintiff (appellant) brought an action of revindication (ejectment) against the defendant (aj)pellee) in the federal District Court for Puerto Eico, to recover a triangular tract of land of 6.81 cuerdas, claimed by the defendant to be owned by him as a part of a larger property called “La Lechuga.” Thereafter, on May 23, 1931, the defendant filed a cross-bill to quiet title to his property “La Lechuga,” including the triangular tract of land of 6.81 cuerdas, and to remove a cloud therefrom, and, among other things, in the eighth article of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. American Sugar Refining Co. v. NassifCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
  3. Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cosme v. MarquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1938
  2. Gorbea v. Soto GrasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
  3. United Porto Rican Sugar Co. v. SaldanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  4. People of Puerto Rico v. United Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  5. United Porto Rican Sugar Co. v. SaldanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API