Legal Opinion

Giddings v. Board of Trustees

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1913No. L.A. No. 3371PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Board of Trustees of the City of San Buenaventura. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate requiring respondents either to adopt an ordinance proposed by electors of the city, or to call a special election in said city and to submit such proposed ordinance to the electors thereof at such special election. The proposed ordinance is one in effect prohibiting the traffic in alcoholic liquors in said city. This application was originally made to the district court of appeal for the second district, which issued an alternative writ of mandate. After hearing in such court, it was ordered that a writ of mandate issue as prayed for.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ex Parte BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. California Teachers Assn. v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Galvin v. Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Davies v. WhiteNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State v. MusserIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Baum v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API