Legal Opinion
State v. DeBorde
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 23, 1996No. 16073PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
1. Defendant Cody DeBorde appeals from a judgment revoking his probation. Defendant asserts he was unable to adequately prepare for his hearing because the District Attorney (DA) refused to provide reasonable discovery concerning the witnesses and evidence the DA intended to present. Defendant advances several constitutional and statutory arguments. Because we find that New Mexico’s rules of criminal procedure require reasonable discovery, including disclosure of adverse witnesses prior to a probation revocation hearing, we do not reach the constitutional issues. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cuciak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LeonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. GuthrieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. MarquartNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. PhillipsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.