Legal Opinion

Eifert v. Fortis Benefits Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 8, 1994No. 9304-02558; CA A81714PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

In this action to recover benefits under a life insurance policy, plaintiff, the personal representative of the Estate of Thomas Hess, appeals from a judgment for defendant Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, assigning error to the trial court’s granting of summary judgment to defendant.

Hess purchased a whole life policy from defendant in 1985. The face value of the policy is $32,377. The policy contains a cash surrender option that permits the policy holder to surrender the policy by submitting a written request to do so, along with the policy itself, to defendant. The policy provides that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meier v. New Jersey Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Taylor v. BonillaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. LaDow v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nolan v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API