Legal Opinion

United States v. Hinen

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided May 12, 2007No. 2:07CR00005PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JONES, Chief Judge.

The defendant, charged with failing to register as a sex offender under the new Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, has moved to dismiss the indictment on constitutional and procedural grounds. For the reasons set forth, the motion will be denied.

I

By indictment returned March 6, 2007, it was charged that between August 1, 2006, and February 17, 2007, the defendant Richard Dean Hinen, while being a person required to register pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, traveled in interstate commerce and failed to register or…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. HinckleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. MaderaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Mi Kyung ByunCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. ComstockDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API