Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Texhoma Limestone, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 22, 2004No. 99,513PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoudreau, J.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from a summary disposition order of the district court. The district court, finding that plaintiffs claim against defendants should have been filed as a compulsory counterclaim in a prior action, dismissed the claim with prejudice to its refiling. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. The dispositive question on certiora-ri is whether the district court erred in dismissing plaintiffs claim as barred by 12 O.S. 2001, § 2013(A). We answer in the affirmative. Accordingly, we vacate the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals and reverse the district court’s summary disposition…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and A. Leroy Jones v. Fred H. EllerdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Valley View Angus Ranch, Inc. v. Duke Energy Field Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Cline v. Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive JusticeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Cotner v. GoldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Save Ad Valorem Funding for Students v. Oklahoma Department of Environmental QualityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Winterhalder v. Burggraf Restoration, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.