Legal Opinion

Glassman v. Surpless

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1907Published

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the City Gourt of the city of Hew York dismissing the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.

For injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon her through the negligence of the defendants, plaintiff sues to recover damages. The complaint charges that the defendants are the owners of a building eleven stories high, *587in which passenger elevator cars are maintained and operated by their employees; that on the day of the accident plaintiff was employed by one of the defendants’ tenants who occupied the tenth floor; that, in going to and from her work, it was necessary for her to use the elevator; that, on the evening of February 8, 1904, using due and reasonable care and without negligence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Volkmar v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Jones v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Peck v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Guldseth v. CarlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API