Legal Opinion

Wade v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

The single exception stressed on the argument and chiefly relied upon in defendant’s brief is the one addressed to the following portion of the charge:

“You have heard the evidence and it is for you to say whether or not the damage to the land has been greater than the special benefit accruing to it, and. if you so find whatever amount you find will be your answer to this issue. But if you find the special benefit is greater than the damage you would answer the issue Nothing’.”

At the time of the relocation of the road in question and when this suit was instituted, the rule for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Elks v. . Comrs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Lanier v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Springfield & Illinois Southeastern Railway Co. v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Highway & Public Works Commission v. HartleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Board of Com'rs of Dona Ana County v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. City of Durham v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API