Legal Opinion
In re Mandel
New York County Courts
Decided June 29, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Daniel Palmieri, J.
This is a proceeding to determine whether and to what extent a person convicted under a Federal statute is required to register and be classified under New York’s Megan’s Law, Corree*898tion Law article 6-C (hereinafter referred to as SORA [Sex Offender Registration Act]).
The subject of this proceeding (the respondent) was convicted in the Eastern District of New York of a violation of 18 USC § 2252A (b) (2), dealing with the knowing possession of child pornography. For purposes of the crime under which the respondent was convicted, “child pornography” is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. GrateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- North v. Board of ExaminersNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. WrotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- State v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- In re NadelNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- In re R.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.