Legal Opinion
In re Nadel
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 2001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosalyn Richter, J.
In this proceeding, this court must decide whether it has the authority to review a determination made by the New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (the Board) requiring David Nadel (respondent), who was convicted of a Federal sex offense, to register in New York State as a sex offender. For the reasons discussed herein, the court concludes that it has the power to review whether the Board’s determination is legally correct. Upon reviewing the Board’s decision, the court finds that the Board erred when it determined that respondent’s Federal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. MunizNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. David W.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- North v. Board of ExaminersNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. WrotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. LidenNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- In re R.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.