Legal Opinion

Autosales Gum & Chocolate Co. v. Ryede Specialty Works

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 6, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by the Autosales Gum & Chocolate Company and the Empire Trust Company, as trustees, against the Ryede Specialty Works, for infringement of claims,5, 6, and 24 of letters patent No. 665,977, for a coin-controlled mechanism, granted to Walter H. Pumphrey January 15, 1901. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

In August, 1900, when Pumphrey filed his application, the slot machine art, if it may be so called, had narrowed to a point where the field was limited to improvements directed to greater simplicity and durability.

“My invention,” said Pumphrey, “relates to coin-operated mechanism of a class adapted particularly for use in connection with ‘slot machines.’ _ In machines of this character the use of a coin for tripping a lock by its weight or the'momentum acquired in its passage through a chute ordinarily necessitates the employment of a locking mechanism, the co-operating…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Gray Telephone Pay Station Co. v. Baird Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
  3. Diamond Drill & Machine Co. v. Kelly Bros.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Vacuum Engineering Co. v. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Graphophone Co. v. Emerson Phonograph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API