Legal Opinion
Hastings v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 27, 2004No. AC 23755PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Tammy Hastings, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing her petition for a writ of habeas corpus for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly determined that it lacked jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The court found the following facts. The petitioner was convicted under two different docket numbers and sentenced to a total effective term of eighteen months incarceration, which was to end on January 20, 2001. The respondent commissioner of correction actually released the…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Young v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Spearman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Hastings v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Connelly v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.