Legal Opinion

Melwood Construction Corp. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided October 26, 1984No. Claim No. 63926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerard M. Weisberg, J.

For more than a decade, the New York State Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (Standard Specifications), incorporated into highway construction, design, improvement and reconstruction contracts, has provided a schedule of damages for the failure of a contractor to complete work on time. The amount per calendar day is dependent on the original contract amount.1

The issue for determination is whether, in a government contract, this constitutes a provision for enforceable liquidated damages or an unenforceable penalty.

Claimant, Melwood…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Truck Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Puritan Farms 2nd, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Seidlitz v. . AuerbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Mosler Safe Co. v. Maiden Lane Safe Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Curtis v. . Van BerghNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. City of Rye v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Fargo v. Case Development Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF DADE CTY. v. Romart Const., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Taos Construction Co. v. Penzel Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. C. O. Falter Construction Corp. v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. C. O. Falter Construction Corp. v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API