Legal Opinion

Truck Insurance Exchange v. Amoco Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1995No. B075894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

In a matter involving issues of insurance coverage, plaintiff and appellant Truck Insurance Exchange (Truck) appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent Amoco Corporation (Amoco) in a declaratory relief action alleging Amoco to be the “de facto” insurer for Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (Cyprus), a former wholly owned subsidiary, based on the parent corporation’s corporate policy of self-insuring itself and its subsidiaries. 1 Truck argues summary judgment was improper because Amoco’s statements and actions established the former parent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Truta v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Richardson v. GAB Business Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Denny's Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Legacy Vulcan Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Fort Bragg Unified School District v. Colonial American Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API