Legal Opinion

Quaid v. . Ratkowsky

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1918PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 31, 1918, which reversed an order of Special Term, striking this case from the Special Term calendar and sending it to the Trial Term as an action at law triable by a jury.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 31, 1918, which reversed an order of Special Term, striking this case from the Special Term calendar and sending it to the Trial Term as an action at law triable by a jury. The action was against the individual owner of practically all the shares of stock of a corporation to compel the payment of an unsatisfied judgment obtained against the corporation. The Appellate Division held that the action was properly brought and was maintainable in equity. The following…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Walkovszky v. CarltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Bartle v. Home Owners Cooperative, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Brunswick Corp. v. WaxmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  4. Gafco, Inc. v. H. D. S. Mercantile Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  5. In re the Accounting of MootAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API