Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. One 1985 Ford Thunderbird Automobile

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 16, 1993PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The Commonwealth brought an action in the Superior Court pursuant to G. L. c. 94C, § 47 (d) (1992 ed.), seeking forfeiture of the above automobile on the ground that it was used to transport marihuana seeds. The claimant, Mark L. Salvucci, filed a motion in limine, to exclude from the forfeiture trial evidence indicating that, on June 19, 1991, marihuana plants were growing on the bottom of an unfilled swimming pool in the backyard of a house at 2 Spring Lane in Framingham. The claimant maintained that the evidence concerning the marihuana plants should be excluded because it was the product…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Florida v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. MontanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. BloodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. AmendolaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BuiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. SnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. Krisco Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. StrawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API