E. F. Curialle & Co. v. Kenray Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R Hart, J.
Motion by plaintiff for an order (1) pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, striking out paragraphs First, Third, Fifth and Sixth of the answer of Terry Contracting, Inc., as frivolous; (2) pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 109, dismissing the first affirmative defense contained in paragraphs Eighth to Twenty-second, inclusive, on the ground that said defense consists of new matter insufficient in law as to plaintiff; (3) pursuant to rule 109, dismissing the second affirmative defense on the ground that said defense consists of new matter insufficient in law as to plaintiff; or,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Folinsbee v. . SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Solomon v. LaGuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Szemko v. WeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Dempsey v. Mount Sinai HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ace Contracting Co. v. Garfield & Arma AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1990
- Bell v. Liberty Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962