Legal Opinion

Ezell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 2, 2001No. 5D01-171PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

778 So.2d 1071 (2001)

Gregory L. EZELL, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D01-171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 2, 2001.

Gregory L. Ezell, Crawfordville, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

The pro se petition for belated appeal is facially insufficient because it was not made under oath. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(3)(F). Therefore, the petition is denied without prejudice for the petitioner to refile a proper sworn petition. See Harris v. State, 769…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Lane v. GardnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cosby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Lane v. GardnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Riley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Fuller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Grant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API