Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Fuller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 2004No. 5D04-1957Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SHARP, W., J.,

concurring in part;' dissenting in part.

In this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to obtain a belated appeal, Fuller alleges that he asked for an appeal from the denial of a suppression motion, and that it was granted by the trial court as part of his plea agreemént. The trial court appointed a public defender to file an appeal, but he did not do so. Fuller claims that court records and the plea agreement will show he asked for an appeal following the conclusion of his suppression motion and sentencing. However, the petition falls a bit short of what is required under Rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bridges v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Ezell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Nazworth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Riley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API