Legal Opinion

People v. Padgett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1167The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel by virtue of his attorney’s failure to make a certain argument in support of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is without merit. Defense counsel’s argument that the physical evidence did not belong to the defendant — rather than pursuing the argument that the physical evidence belonged to the defendant but should be suppressed because the police lacked reasonable suspicion to detain him — was a legitimate trial tactic and, thus, constituted meaningful…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. WindleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Assatta N.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. WattsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. Delvecchio (Sara)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API