Legal Opinion
United States v. Ibrahim Bare
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 24, 2015No. 14-10475PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TALLMAN; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
On December 13, 2012, a jury convicted Ibrahim Fahab Bare — a non-Indian who lives on tribal land with his common-law wife — of two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Bare challenges his 4-level sentencing enhancement for his use of a firearm in connection with another felony offense, as well as his condition of supervised release permitting searches of his computers and other electronic devices by a United States Probation Officer. We hold that due to the Assimilative Crimes Act (“ACA”), it…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. T.M.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Mary Marcyes and James Siddle, United States of America v. Benjamin ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Valerie TerrignoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ibrahim Bare v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Johnny SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- (PC) Bland v. CoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- United States v. Brent LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Carl BeltCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.