Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Baloun
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 19, 1989No. 88 C 2077PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this case, David and Susan Peterson (“the Petersons”), filed a seven-count complaint alleging that defendants’ fraudulent conduct induced them into investing in a venture in which they lost over $50,000. In response to the Pe-tersons’ allegations, defendants James Allen Baloun (“Baloun”) and James Allen Baloun Company, Ltd. (“Baloun Company”) have submitted a “motion to strike” the complaint. Defendants’ motion, however, exceeds the proper scope of a motion to strike. Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: “Motion to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Margaret Morgan and Burton Morgan v. Bank of Waukegan, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,975 Michelle K. Tomera, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Arthur T. Galt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Continental Bank, N.A. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Ehlerding v. American Mattress & Upholstery, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016
- Driveaway & Truckaway Service, Inc. v. Aaron Driveaway & Truckaway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Continental Bank v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Goldfine v. Barack, Ferrazzano, Kirschbaum and PerlmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.