Broad Street National Bank v. Lit Bros
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Wauling,
In August, 1924, the Barke-Gibbon Company, Inc., engaged in the manufacture and sale of shoes in Philadelphia, was adjudged bankrupt. During the previous May it had, as one transaction, sold and delivered to Lit Brothers, for a fair price and in good faith, all the shoes it had in stock. This was done without compliance with the Bulk Sales Act of May 23, 1919, P. L. 262, and a creditor of the bankrupt corporation brought this suit in equity against Lit Brothers. In view of our decision in Gitt v. Hoke et al., 301 Pa. 31, the lower court held that the Bulk Sales…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Charges J. Off & Co. v. MoreheadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Hart v. BrierleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Spurr v. TravisMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- G. S. Johnson Co. v. BelooskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Everett Produce Co. v. Smith Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- International S Co (Et Al) v. DuttenhoferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Frederick v. Dettary Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Samuelson v. GoldbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Union National Bank v. Garvey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1936