Legal Opinion

Sebolt v. Pindelski

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided April 15, 2020No. 1:17-cv-01212Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Philip M. Sebolt, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:17cv1212 (AJT/MSN) ) John A. Pindelski, et al., ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINON AND ORDER Philip M. Sebolt, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), seeking monetary damages and declaratory relief for defendant’s failure to admit him to a sex offender treatment program. [Dkt. No. 1]. The Court dismissed his complaint on November 16, 2017…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API