Legal Opinion

United States v. Manuel Parrado and Elfobaldo Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 20, 1990No. 89-5756PublishedCited by 68 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Manuel Parrado and Elfobal-do Rodriguez were found guilty by a jury on two counts of a superseding indictment filed on March 31, 1988. Count one charged defendants with conspiracy to distribute in excess of five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Count two charged defendants with possession with intent to distribute in excess of five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841.

Appellants Parrado and Elfobaldo Rodriguez raise several claims on appeal. They both challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support their conspiracy…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. United States v. Marvin BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Alberto CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. EggersdorfCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. GhertlerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API