Legal Opinion

Bowerman v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided May 24, 1952No. Civ. 626, 627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Bowerman and Pacific Indemnity Company, and plaintiffs Burris and Pacific Indemnity Company, brought these two suits against Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Inc., Chrysler Corporation, Chrysler Sales Corporation, and Jensen & Raupe Motor Company, a partnership consisting of E. J. Jensen and J. D. Raupe, for damages alleged to 'have been sustained in an accident on October 23, 1950, in Montague County, Texas, when an allegedly defective tire manufactured by the defendant, Goodyear, blew out, and caused the accident.

Tire tire had been placed on the car by the Chrysler…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Willoughby v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Bentley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  5. Edwards v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robert D. Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Knight v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
  3. Franks v. National Dairy Products CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1968
  4. Henry Kraft Mercantile Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1952
  5. Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. TunksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API