Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. Tunks
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
This is an original proceeding for mandamus to require the trial court to enter judgment in a cause wherein he had set aside the verdict of the jury and declared a mistrial. Among the issues to be considered are: (1) the necessity for privity in a suit for personal injuries based on implied warranty, and (2) whether contributory negligence is a defense in such a suit.
This suit was instituted by William Earl Munsinger, for himself and as next friend of his minor son, against the retailer, the distributor, and the manufacturer of kerosene oil purchased by him, which exploded…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Whitaker v. Harvell-Kilgore Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Jacobs v. TECHNICAL CHEMICAL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Ratcliff v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Harold Glenn Whitaker v. Harvell-Kilgore Corporation and Day & Zimmerman, Inc., Lura Madden Whitaker v. Harvell-Kilgore Corporation and Day & Zimmerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.