Lorraine Jones v. Pullman Kellogg Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
This diversity case involves a challenge to a Texas law imposing a limitations period on actions brought against architects and engineers. Plaintiff-appellant Lorraine Jones argues that putting a ten-year limitations period on claims arising out of defective or unsafe buildings or equipment violates the Open Courts clause of the Texas Constitution, which provides that “All courts shall be open, and every person for an injury done him, in his lands, goods, person or reputation, shall have a remedy by due course of law.” 1 We conclude that this case is controlled by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Ellerbe v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Sowders v. M.W. Kellogg Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Thorington v. CashCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pender v. Texas NAPCO, Inc. (In re LaJet, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008