Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sheldon Levine v. Commissioner of Correctional Services

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 3, 1995No. 75, Docket 93-2803Published

1ConcurrenceVan Graafeiland, Circuit Judge

Because of the constraints imposed upon the federal courts in their exercise of jurisdiction under 22 U.S.C. § 2254, I concur. I do so with great reluctance, however, because I believe that Sheldon Levine’s due process rights were violated during his sentencing.

Recognizing that sentencing must satisfy the requirements of due process, see Innes v. Dalsheim, 864 F.2d 974, 977 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 809, 110 S.Ct. 50, 107 L.Ed.2d 19 (1989), and People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702, 712, 594 N.Y.S.2d 683, 610 N.E.2d 356 (1993), the New York courts emphasize the importance of explaining…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. OutleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Innes v. DalsheimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. People v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. MolesseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API