Legal Opinion
Doe v. Oshrin
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 28, 2014No. Civil No. 14-42 (JHR/AMD)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN MARIE DONIO, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Jane Doe’s motion to proceed in this litigation by pseudonym. Plaintiff, an alleged victim of child pornography, seeks to pursue anonymously her federal and state tort law claims against Defendant. Defendant does not object to Plaintiff using a pseudonym in publicly available documents and/or oral communications.1 The Court finds that Plaintiff meets the strong burden necessary to proceed in this action by pseudonym. Consequently, for the reasons that follow, the Court grants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doe v. C.A.R.S Protection Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Doe v. MeglessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Doe v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Doe v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Pedro Lozano v. City of HazletonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- 1-21 v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Emanuel County School SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2015
- John Doe v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- C.V. v. CARMINUCCIDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- DOE 1 v. PERKIOMEN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.