Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 25, 1986No. CO-85-2043Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

The State of Minnesota and the City of Rosemount appeal the trial court’s order dismissing the D.W.I. complaint against respondent Robert Anderson. We reverse and remand for trial.

FACTS

The facts of this case are identical to those in Anderson v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 379 N.W.2d 678 (Minn.App.1985). In that case, the state successfully appealed the trial court’s dismissal of an implied consent charge. The main issue there, as here, was whether the trial court erred in ruling that respondent did not “refuse” the test when he did not respond to the officer’s offer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Anderson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API