State v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
The State of Minnesota and the City of Rosemount appeal the trial court’s order dismissing the D.W.I. complaint against respondent Robert Anderson. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
The facts of this case are identical to those in Anderson v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 379 N.W.2d 678 (Minn.App.1985). In that case, the state successfully appealed the trial court’s dismissal of an implied consent charge. The main issue there, as here, was whether the trial court erred in ruling that respondent did not “refuse” the test when he did not respond to the officer’s offer…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Anderson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984