Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1986No. C9-85-1053PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Respondent’s driving privileges were revoked for refusal to take a breath test. Respondent petitioned for judicial review, and the trial court found that no refusal had occurred. The Commissioner of Public Safety appeals. We reverse.
FACTS
Deputy Sheriff Jerome Cotton was driving in the City of Rosemount when he came upon a two car accident. He asked the two drivers whether they were injured and how the accident occurred. Respondent, a volunteer firefighter for the City of Rose-mount, said he was responding to a fire call when the other driver drove out of a parking lot…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State Department of Highways v. NormandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State, Department of Public Safety v. EarlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mossak v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. DegnanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Gabrick v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re the Driving Privileges of HamsteadCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
- Ekong v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.