Legal Opinion

Trensky v. Johnson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 30, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order and judgment each entered on or about February 27, 2002 reversed, without costs, defendant’s counterclaims are dismissed and judgment is awarded to plaintiff on the main action in the principal sum of $2,148.59.

The doctrine of res judicata requires dismissal of the breach of contract and fraud counterclaims interposed by defendant in this small claims action, since defendant had the opportunity to raise those claims in the prior Supreme Court declaratory judgment action between these parties and involving the same real estate transaction (see, Sandcham Realty Corp. v…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boorman v. DeutschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Brown v. RistichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Trisingh Enterprises, Inc. v. KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Sandcham Realty Corp. v. TaubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Petrolle v. GlavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Tucker v. Certified Automotive Servs.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API