Legal Opinion

State v. Freel

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 5, 2001No. 85,221PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marquardt, J.:

Patrick S. Freel appeals his convictions for one count of possession of methamphetamine with the intent to sell, one count of failure to affix a drug tax stamp, and one count of possession of paraphernalia. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions consistent with this opinion.

Deputy Phillip Higdon received a call from a confidential informant (Cl) who stated that Freel was in possession of one or two “eight balls” of methamphetamine. The Cl told the deputy where Freel’s maroon station wagon was parked.

When Freel pulled out of the parking lot, he failed to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Meadows v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. State v. TauaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API