Legal Opinion
Pizzichil v. Motors Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 24, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 80-2694PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUONGO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Daniel Pizzichil brought this action against his insurance carrier Motors Insurance Corporation, alleging that Motors had failed to indemnify Pizzichil for a loss allegedly covered under his motor vehicle policy with Motors. Because there was less than fifty thousand dollars at issue, the case was referred to a panel of arbitrators pursuant to Rule 8 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. After a hearing, the arbitrators rendered an award in favor of the defendant. The award was filed with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Easement & Right-of-WayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Youngson v. LuskDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
- Daniel E. Garris, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Wolfsohn v. RaabDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Wilson v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- In Re QuevedoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983
- In Re W & L Associates, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re AntellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.