Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Fortier

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 30, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is a suit in equity to restrain the defendant from flowing the plaintiff’s land by obstructing the flow of a stream or brook. This suit and another brought by the same plaintiff against the same defendant were referred to a master, who states in his report that they were tried together before him and involved substantially identical issues. The master found that in the first suit the town of Auburn was originally a party defendant, but prior to the hearings that suit had been dismissed as to it; that the second suit *270was brought without knowledge on the part of the present counsel of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. McGowen v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Yaskill v. ThibaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fortier v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. DiNardo v. DovidioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Neponset Reservoir Corp. v. BashawMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Lincoln Park Amusement Co. v. Town of WestportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Ullian v. CullenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API