Legal Opinion

DiNardo v. Dovidio

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 21, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The plaintiffs and the defendants are the owners respectively of two parcels of adjoining land. The defendants hold title as heirs at law of one Frank Dovidio, who *400purchased in 1916. The plaintiffs purchased their parcel in 1920. On October 17, 1940, the plaintiffs brought this bill in equity seeking to restrain the defendants from obstructing an alleged watercourse originating on their land and extending across the defendants’ land. They also asked that their damages be assessed.

The plaintiffs excepted to the findings of the master upon the sole question of damages. A final decree was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Fortier v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Truc v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Jackman v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eno v. Prime Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Kuklinska v. Maplewood Homes, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Lombardi v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Strong v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  5. Kattor v. SabatiniMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API