Legal Opinion

Joffrion-Woods, Inc. v. St. James Bank & Trust Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1930No. 13,356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

The facts in this case are in substantial accord with the allegations of plaintiff’s petition, and appear at length in our opinion and decree reversing a judgment rendered upon the face of the papers, reported in 10 La. App. 658, 121 So. 378.

As intimated in that opinion, we believe that the case turns upon the interpretation to be given Act 86 of 1926. That act declares:

“That no State or National bank, located in this State, which shall receive for collection or deposit negotiable or non-negotiable paper or securities, payable elsewhere than at the place of its domicile and by it forwarded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Henefin v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Martin v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. Joffrion-Woods, Inc. v. St. James Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joffrion-Woods, Inc. v. St. James Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Bain v. WorshamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API