Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. De Bord

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 15, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Potter County; J. W. Browning, Judge. Action by Rolla De Bord against the Chicago, Rock Island & Gulf Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

Rolla De Bord, a brakeman on one of the trains belonging to the Chicago, Rock Island & Gulf Railway Company, sued that company and recovered damages for injuries received by him while attempting to switch a car of coal up a steep incline to a coal chute at McLean, Tex. The negligence relied on was, first, that the coal bins were too close to the track, and, second, that the engineer of the train failed to stop after receiving a signal from the plaintiff. The defense was a general denial, assumed risk, and contributory negligence. The answer of the witness Jones to the effect that it is more…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas Midland R.R. Co. v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MathisTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. International & Great Northern Railroad v. ButcherTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Forth Worth Belt Railway Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Payne v. BannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Laird v. Williams & ChastainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API