Legal Opinion

Young v. Aro Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1973No. Civ. 38571PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

Wrongful death. After a judgment in favor of defendant, Aro Corporation, plaintiff Janetta Young as administratrix of the estate of Carl C. Young, appeals.

Facts

On September 9, 1964, Carl Young, plaintiff’s decedent, was employed by U.S. Filter Company as a welder. On that day he received a serious injury while using a portable grinder manufactured, sold and later repaired and serviced by defendant Aro Corporation (“Aro”). A high speed abrasive wheel attached to the grinder disintegrated. Young died from the effects of the injuries a few weeks later.

The evidence concerning…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Von Beltz v. Stuntman, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Codekas v. Dyna-Lift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Government Employees Insurance v. Carrier InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Lenthall v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API