Legal Opinion
Bayle v. First National Bank
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBrewster, J.
This action is brought for a judgment to compel the defendant, which is its own transfer agent, to transfer to plaintiff 147 shares of its capital stock which stand in the name of her husband on the books of the defendant, certificates of which he indorsed in blank and delivered to an assistant cashier of the defendant with instructions to make such transfer. "Such an action, equitable in nature, has been distinctly long recognized by our courts. (Cushman v. Thayer Mfg. Jewelry Co., 76 N. Y. 365, 368; Travis v. Knox Terpezone Co., 215 id. 259, 263.) It is undisputed that the delivery of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cushman v. Thayer Manufacturing Jewelry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Fisher v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Parsons v. LipeNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Hanover National Bank of New York v. SuddathSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Parsons v. First Trust and Deposit CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Epstein v. Trade Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945