Hughes v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This case has been in this Court once before, and is reported in 65 Mich. 10 (31 N. W. Rep. 603).
The usual questions as to the negligence of plaintiff and defendant in cases of this kind are not found in this record. The defense objects to the charge of the court, contending that a different case was submitted to the jury than that alleged by the plaintiff in his declaration; also that it was inconsistent and misleading, but in what respect is not very clearly pointed out. No fault is found in the admission or rejection of testimony on the trial, nor is any of the evidence given in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marcott v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Keyser v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
- LeRoy v. East Saginaw City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Hughes v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Denman v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Oxenger v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Herriman Irrigation Co. v. KeelUtah Supreme Court · 1902
- Lauer v. PalmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.