King & Johnson Rental Equipment Co. v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentHathaway, Judge
Summary judgment should be cautiously entered, Northern Contracting Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 117 Ariz. 374, 573 P.2d 65 (1977). Extreme care should be used to determine whether a genuine issue of material fact exists, Mozes v. Daru, 4 Ariz.App. 385, 420 P.2d 957 (1967). Even where mate*281rial facts are not in dispute, but are uncertain, summary judgment is improper. Boozer v. Arizona Country Club, 102 Ariz. 544, 434 P.2d 630 (1967). Thus, review of the denial of a motion for summary judgment by special action should be sparingly exercised; review should not be exercised unless judicial error…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boozer v. Arizona Country ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Mozes v. DaruCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Northern Contracting Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Southwest Cooperative Wholesale v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Warinner v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974