Legal Opinion
State v. Flores
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided October 17, 1990No. 90-0459PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
Robert Flores appéals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under sec. 974.06, Stats. Flores raises three issues: (1) that his due process rights at sentencing were violated when he was denied timely access to his presentence investigation report (PSI), State v. Skaff, 152 Wis. 2d 48, 447 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1989); (2) that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel; and, (3) that he was entitled to a modification of sentence as a result of "new factors."
The trial court found that Flores was not denied due process at the sentencing hearing because it was not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Lusk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Flores v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LittrupCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.