Legal Opinion
Richmond Printing v. Port of Houston Authority
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided February 25, 1999No. 14-98-00087-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSS A. SEARS, Justice (Assigned).
The dispute in this case arises from a breach of contract claim. Richmond Printing (Richmond) sued the Port of Houston Authority (the Authority) alleging that the Authority wrongfully canceled the contract. The Authority filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the contract was void and legally unenforceable. Richmond replied to the Authority’s motion and filed a writ of mandamus requesting the trial court to order the Authority to execute the contract. The trial court granted the Authority’s summary judgment. We affirm.
Background
In October…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Rivercenter Associates v. RiveraTexas Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McCreary v. Bay Area Bank & Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Dovers v. Stephenson Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- City of Denton v. Municipal Administrative Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- TXU Energy Retail Company L.L.C. v. Fort Bend Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Ken Bigham and Tracy Hollister v. Southeast Texas Environmental, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.