Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Fry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Defendant, furnishing part of the land and other parties furnishing another part, platted and put on the market Sherwood Forest subdivision just outside the city limits of Detroit. The following year and before plaintiff purchased a lot the property was annexed to the city. On March 1, 1917, plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant to purchase lot 330, which was in the portion of the subdivision owned by him. The contract contains in detail many restrictions making the subdivision a strictly high grade residential district. The contract contained the following provision:

“Nine. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meier v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. City of Des Moines v. DorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Bedard v. BonvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Michigan Chandelier Co. v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Barniak v. GrossmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Keller v. Paulos Land CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Keller v. Paulos Land Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Roy Annett, Inc. v. KillinMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API