Legal Opinion

Motte v. Carnegie Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1934No. Appeal 173PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

An employer and its insurance carrier have appealed from a judgment entered by the court below in a compensation case. The disposition of the appeal is controlled by Ludington v. Russell Coal Company et al., 90 Pa. Superior Ct. 318, and Barlock v. Orient Coal and Coke Company et al., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 228, 173 A. 666. Under the principles stated in those cases, the judgment here appealed from must be reversed.

The applicable legislation is Section 306, paragraphs (a) and (b), of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended by the Act of June…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barlock v. Orient Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Ludington v. Russell Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tinsman v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Sayre v. Textile Machine WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Lomancik v. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Kelemon v. ReiberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Parks v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API